Vitae's 1st AP Claim

[Vitae]

Main Class: 

Main Class Claims: 
THE CAVALIER AND WARDEN [CLOSED]
509 Words
334 Words
400 Words
293 Words
Total Word Count: 1536
Main Class AP Claimed: 6



Total Claim:

Link to Previous Claim: 
Pre-Claim AP: (Enter the amount of AP you have distributed among your three classes as of your previous claim.)
Main Class: - 0AP
Craft Subclass: - 0AP
RP Subclass: - 0AP
Post-Claim AP: (Enter the amount of AP you will have distributed among your three classes if your claim is approved.)
Main Class: - AP
Craft Subclass: - 0AP
RP Subclass: - 0AP
Final Levels: (List your character's levels upon successful claim.)
Main Class Level: - 4
Craft Subclass Level: - 1
RP Subclass Level: - 1
Requested Skill(s):

Nature Revive
Tier I Skill

A revival skill on par with the Cleric's Resurrection skills. It can only be used if the target has only been incapacitated within the last 10 seconds. This skill will bathe the target in blue light and resurrect them with low HP. There is also a slow HP regeneration effect upon revive. The only downside to this ability is that a target cannot be revived again by this skill for 2 minutes, so the party should quickly support them back up to a safe state as soon as possible. This skill has a casting time of 5 seconds and a cooldown of 90 seconds.

[Data Holder]

Okay. This time, I know what I'm doing. I swear.

I apologize, but you are only allowed to claim for one of your characters in any thread. This will impact on your total AP Claim here, so I would like to ask that you claim for only threads in which it is only this character, and not any of your alternate characters.

However, should you still want to RP as both characters, you're free to do so. If you wanted to, you can actually RP as both, under one name, and that name that you RP under will gain the AP from whatever claims you make.

[Vitae]

Okay, it's good know about this since I don't remember reading this rule. Anyways claim is edited and now good to go.

[Data Holder]

Thank you for being cooperative on the matter. I don't think we have it written somewhere before, but we've turned down other claims like this before. Wouldn't do much good to change our minds based on the situation.

That being said, Approved.